The Duke is Insane

The ending of Measure for Measure revealed the true nature of the Duke’s character: he is an apt, forgiving, just, caring ruler after all, and any attempts to replace him will fail. The Duke will go to extraordinary lengths to prove this, which is how the play begins. Shakespeare makes it seem that the Duke was giving up his position as an act of cowardice, a general unwillingness to uphold the law. The Duke, probably sensing that the people pf Vienna held this opinion, decided to spy on anyone and everyone who had anything to do with his rule and the law of the land.

The best part of this elaborate plan was his return to rule in Vienna and the subsequent revelation that he was the friar that many of the main characters have been confiding in. He dishes out a number of punishments to almost everyone, to take them back a few lines later, showing that he’s a kind ruler. He goes along with Angelo’s opinion that Isabella and Mariana are lying and crazy, and has Isabella sent away to jail at first. After being revealed as the friar, he first forces Angelo to marry Mariana for engaging in pre-marital sex, then he condemns him to death for the hypocritical punishment of Claudio for the same “crime.” The Duke forces Lucio to marry whatever prostitute he impregnated, then orders him to be flogged and killed.

Suddenly, though, the Duke simply forgives everyone. Everyone. Claudio, Angelo, and Lucio all must get married to their respective partners. Lucio is the only unhappy one here, as he likens marrying a whore to getting beaten and executed: “Marrying a punk, my lord, is pressing to death, whipping, and hanging” (5.1.515-516). Even a prisoner of nine years, Barnardine, who was supposed to be executed, who was even seriously recommenced to be executed in Claudio’s place by the Duke, was pardoned. Barnardine’s probably the second strongest character in this play, besides the Duke, because he puts off his execution by being too drunk and lazy to cooperate. When he’s called upon to die, he even announces he’s going back to his cell to go to sleep. I love the Duke’s explanation for Barnadine’s pardon: “Sirrah, thou art said to have a stubborn soul / That apprehends no further than this world, / And squar’st thy life according. Thou’rt condemned; / But, for those earthly faults, I quit them all,” (5.1.474-477). That’s like saying, “Barney, you refuse to die, and have no aspirations. But everyone’s got their own problems. You’re pardoned.” Perhaps the Duke saw a little of himself in Barnadine.

Redemption is a strong theme within this play. Virtually every character gets let off the hook for their various crimes, no matter how serious. Even Pompey gets to execute people for the rest of his life. Good for him. I’d say that this play is a commentary about the unnecessary harshness of puritan values. Angelo represents a move towards that conservative, unforgiving nature, of Puritanism. The Duke, however, represents Shakespeare’s opinion of the previous, relaxed rule of Elizabeth I. He’s such a perfect ruler in the play that it’s clear Shakespeare wanted this type of ruler to come back, as opposed to the Puritan rule of King James after her death.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “The Duke is Insane

  1. Meaghan Platania

    I agree with a lot of what you have to say here, but I can't help but to wonder if the Duke has really made any progress at all throughout the play. When the play begins, we learn that the Duke has been unsuccessful in enforcing the laws of his country and that he needs help from someone else to get his affairs back in order. Then at the end of the play the Duke comes back into power and essentially does what he was doing all along in pardoning each character. I can't help but to wonder if the Duke has really proven or learned anything.

    Reply
  2. Steffi

    I agree with Meaghan, I'm not entirely sure that the Duke has improved, nor has he been able to handle his own affairs. But at the same time I agree with you completely that the Duke represents a the theme of rehabilitation. It was so important for the play as a comedy to have a relatively happy ending in the marriages and atonement of all the characters.

    Reply
  3. chrisj122

    Yeah I mean, these are both good questions Meaghan and Steffi…and it kind of sucks that we never get to know for sure; but I see a little Machiavellian side in the Duke, in being harsh and pulling back, and also in making people wary of his intentions going forward. Think, will people act differently if the Duke leaves town again, unsure of where has gone or if he's still around?

    Reply
  4. Chris Sullivan

    I really like the paragraph about Barnardine especially your assesment of his character being the second strongest after the Duke. Quite an achivement for a character barely in it. His method for avoiding his execution is downright absurd and flows nicely with the "just go with it" logic in most comedies.

    Reply
  5. Stephanie

    In terms of the Duke's behavior throughout the play, I agree with you somewhat. However, I see him a bit more cynically. Right from the beginning I believe that he is just "fishing for compliments" like a person who insults themselves, hoping for positive feedback. Then he deceives everyone around him, and finally swoops in when he knows everyone will need him to save the day. He isn't a good person, he is just uncharacteristically good at understanding and predicting the behavior of the people around him, and manipulating them in such a way that everyone thinks he is wonderful. He only left so that everyone would want him back.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s