Midsummer Act V, Tragedy and Humor

The play within a play in A Midsummer Night’s Dream is a peculiar device in the way it is executed, leaving much of the reason for its inclusion up to interpretation. The actual play happens at the end of the resolution, as an added bit of comedy. But is it really just for laughs?

In my eyes, Shakespeare includes the play within a play as a way to comment on the nature of love in Midsummer, and the nature of love in comedies and tragedies in general. A Midsummer Night’s Dream opens with a very serious impending threat – the possible execution of a girl for her refusal to conform to patriarchal rule. This could be the very opening of a tragedy, but the comedy begins in the way Shakespeare decides to portray the lover’s plight. The play within a play mirrors this depiction; Shakespeare takes a classic tragedy, and through the mechanical’s dismal understanding of tragedy, it becomes comic genius. Theseus and his court are thoroughly entertained, making various jests at the expense of the production’s disjointed portrayal. Theseus takes great pleasure in the comedy, proclaiming that “This palpable gross play hath beguil’d / The heavy gait of night.” (5.1.361-2). He recognizes the need for self parody, and to laugh at one’s own tragedy and pain. 

Shakespeare understands that a doomed love can either be funny, like in A Midsummer Night’s Dream, or it can be deadly, like Pyramus and Thisbe or Romeo and Juliet. Sure, the play within a play is comic, but it’s also Shakespeare’s way of telling the audience that tragedy and comedy are what you make of them.  


One thought on “Midsummer Act V, Tragedy and Humor

  1. jamesfrauenberger

    I really liked your interpretation of the play within the play. This is my second time reading A Midsummer Night’s Dream, and I find the performance of the rude mechanicals to be a confusing, but important, aspect of the play. Some readers find in the scene an excessively broad humor and seeming pointlessness after the apparent resolution of the play’s primary problems and threats. The scene IS hilarious though, but more importantly, it enforces the metaficitional themes that will be made more explicit in Robin Goodfellow’s closing speech. It gives the reader/audience a profound sense of Shakespeare’s playful awareness of genre and his need to parody it, something that you made very clear in your post.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s